They should remake the first two games that came out in 1987 and 1990, rather than MGS3.
Why the hell are they remaking MGS3? A 6 year old game? It was stupid enough remaking MGS1 after the same amount of years, and it's stupid now.
Have you never played The Sims?
This asshole is the reason OtherOS was removed in the first place.
360 has been hacked for years, games are still made for it.
Why did they remove the colour from the face buttons?
LA Noire has amazing facial animations, but I think the textures themselves leave a lot to be desired. Look a bit too clay-like.
Miyamoto also has a lot of expenses paid for by Nintendo.
Everyone's gay for Big Boss
You just know that most of the content in this version will have to be paid for via micro-transactions. Not gonna bother.
@Balt - Wait, you're the guy who wants the videogame business to fail. Fuck off.
They get decent scores from the critics, but they get worse every year. They take out several features, then put them back in later and market them as brand new. Then when fans complain, they say "next year".
Game's shit anyway, last great one was 2006.
If you don't like gaming, why are you on this site?
Saw one of his videos, fat fuck with a shitty sense of humour.
Blitzball was incredibly fucking tedious. Only reason I did it was to get Wakka's ultimate weapon.
PS1 and 2 had both sales and quality.
BTW, "you're", not "your". Crucial not to make a spelling mistake when trying to call someone else stupid.
Danny DeVito.
You guys have no sense of humour.
Just went back to playing MGS4 after finishing Peace Walker, graphics have aged extremely well, just like MGS2 & 3.
As for Splinter Cell, I loved Chaos Theory (AMAZING stealth elements), but Double Agent was a step back, and Conviction placed too much emphasis on action and pointless gimmicks.